In my first post on this blog, I set myself 3 PhD-related goals for 2017. One of those goals was to read more widely, and more frequently, and I decided that doing the #365papers challenge would be a good way to do that.
I ended last month’s #365papers update by saying ‘hopefully September’s reading won’t be quite so late as August’s was…’ – and here I am 13 days late. September was a really busy month and though I was reading, it was snippets and abstracts and posters from conferences, rather than entire papers. I’ve now caught up – and I’m determined to make sure that October’s update is back on track time-wise!
This month’s reading has been a big mix of things because I’m working on my literature review, and also getting involved with some new projects. I’ve really enjoyed this month’s reading – when I had time to do it at least, so hopefully there’s some interesting papers in this list for others too.
September’s reading:
- The ethics of underpowered clinical trials
- The ethics of underpowered clinical trials
- Informing clinical trial participants about study results
- Women’s views and experiences of two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: A qualitative study
- Recruiting patients as partners in health research: a qualitative descriptive study
- Identifying additional studies for a systematic review of retention strategies in randomised controlled trials: making contact with trials units and trial methodologists
- Methods for obtaining unpublished data
- Clinical features of Parkinson’s disease patients are associated with therapeutic misconception and willingness to participate in clinical trials
- Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed
- Health research participants’ preferences for receiving research results
- Why is therapeutic misconception so prevalent?
- Recommendations for the return of research results to study participants and guardians: a report from the children’s oncology group
- Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding offering clinical trial results to study participants
- Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit
- Patient and public involvement in data collection for health services research: a descriptive study
- Health researchers’ attitudes towards public involvement in health research
- Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities
- Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples
- The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review
- Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials
- No longer research about us without us: a researcher’s reflection on rights and inclusive research in Ireland
- Willingness to participate in pragmatic dialysis trials: the importance of physician decisional autonomy and consent approach
- How important is patient recruitment in performing clinical trials?
- Recruiting hard-to-reach subjects: is it worth the effort?
- Fundamental dilemmas of the randomised clinical trial process: results of a survey of the 1,737 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group investigators
- The research-treatment distinction: A problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight
- Leaving therapy to chance
- Use of altered informed consent in pragmatic clinical research
- A framework for analysis of research risks and benefits to participants in standard of care pragmatic clinical trials
- Public engagement on global health challenges